El Chauvinisto: Cunt of the Week
Your Ad Here

Saturday, June 23, 2007

Cunt of the Week


Many of you pussies will be offended by this one, but we here at Chauvinisto don't give a fuck. I'm sure you've all heard of her. What she did in the mid-fifties changed America in two ways. The first, more positive, of these was the beginning of the widespread civil rights movement. The second, more cunt-like, of her actions set in motion a movement that we all despise to this day. By denying a request from a MAN on December 1, 1955, we here at Chauvinisto often refer to this woman as the cuntmother of cuntism/modern feminism. The bitch I'm referring to, in case you're a fucking retard, is Rosa Parks. Our problem with Rosa Parks isn't that she stood up against racism, but rather, the fact that she stood up to a MAN. First, women should never address a man when in public. Second, women should never be allowed to leave the house. Third, when speaking to a woman, if she does not reply with, "may I speak now sir?" than she has over stepped her bounds and needs to be punished. Rosa Parks was one of the first very prominent women to not act on a request from a man. This is why the contributors of Chauvinisto despise this cunt. She started a movement of backtalk that has grown like a vaginal cancer. Women everywhere think they have the right to "speak their mind," or "cunt it up." Sure women have been running their mouths for centuries, but typically those women were in their owners home and were dealt with swiftly. Rosa Parks, on the other hand, took her fucked up mouth to the streets. Her disregard for the patriarchal success story is why Rosa Parks is our Cunt of the Week.

Your Ad Here

19 comments:

  1. I wish I was unloved like you.

    ReplyDelete
  2. We all know you wish you could lose 144lbs. Get off the computer and go jogging...fatty.

    ReplyDelete
  3. If you can't prove your superiority on a level playing field, silence your opponent. El Chauvinisto? You flatter yourself. Your inability to come to grips with your blatant insecurities is positively Freudian in its scope. Why you'd choose to put it in the blogosphere for everyone to peruse is incomprehensible. Attention whore anyone?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Silence my opponent? Seems to me that you have a voice here (unfortunately). Maybe your itty bitty female brain can't grasp such things. Insecurities? Please point them out. Insecurity is what drives your blatant inferiority complex, otherwise you would not come back to this blog. Only a woman has such a weak threshold for keeping her mouth shut.

    ReplyDelete
  5. You don't have to give posters on blogger a voice for you could always moniter and delete comments or turn them off completely. Yet how revealing that you don't. Is provoking an argument the only way you can get a women to talk to you? Coz it sure looks like it.

    ReplyDelete
  6. FYI: I'm the poster who called out your insecurity. I've never been here before, and my comments have nothing whatever to do with intellect. I made no comment denigrating your intellect, but the fact that you chose to 'attack' mine (bit like a kitten attacking a gorilla, but OK) simply lays bare yet another of your insecurities.

    Carry on.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous, it was you who used the horrible argument of "silence your opponent." Consider yourself lucky that I allow your kind to speak freely here. "Is provoking an argument the only way you can get a women to talk to you?" How cliche...

    Anonymous 'FYI': Actually your comments did. By saying, "Your inability to come to grips with your blatant insecurities is positively Freudian in its scope," is, in so many words, like implying your "human analytical expertise."
    That takes intellect and by saying those things I felt I had to challenge yours (who knew a bitch like yourself could be so sensitive though). The funny thing about this is that the "insecurity" argument is the only one any woman can EVER come up with...I wonder if that has to do with a lack of intellect?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. El....she's projecting. Women are notorious for doing that.

      Delete
  8. LOL. You're really confused, now. You've got two women posting anonymously and you can't tell one from the other. Not to worry, El Chauvinsecure ... it wouldn't be sporting to continue trying to spar with you.

    *yawn* Not much fun, either.

    ReplyDelete
  9. "LOL. You're really confused, now. You've got two women posting anonymously and you can't tell one from the other."

    REALLY? Please, elaborate. I wish I could hide behind the "anonymous" name. But guess what....I'm not a woman. I'm man enough to let the world know what I feel (unlike you). Unlike you, I'm a man...which means that I back up my beliefs with one name.

    Yawn...yawn...yawn....please expand on your inferior beliefs.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Uppercaps? Jesus, you can't even hide your excitement. I'm outta here.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Not everyone has to beat their chest and be physically threatening to an entire group of people (yes, I read you on MABTW) in order to feel they are asserting their superiority.

    I'll run along now ... 'cause if this is "man talk" it's not worth my time. Unlike some, I know my worth without belittling others. Some people (male and female) are secure enough to stand on their own merits without falsely elevating themselves on the backs of others.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Hear Ye! Hear Ye! The cunts have given up. The "I'm out of here, this is boring/not worth my time" line has been used. Perhaps their boyfriends informed them that there are better things they can do with their mouths and hands. Gag 'em good fellas.

    ReplyDelete
  13. El Chauvinsto,

    Do you have a daughter? If you do would you want someone in her life to have such hateful thoughts?

    ReplyDelete
  14. John, do you have a wife? Because if you do you should ask her what it's like to be married to a woman.

    ReplyDelete
  15. el chauvinisto, you're a fucking hypocrite! You have a video on this site, condemning violent women, and yet you turn around and poke fun at violence AGAINST women!

    ReplyDelete
  16. I don't "poke fun" at violence against women. I condone it as long as it is just.

    Just as I condone violence against men. As long as it is just.

    The problem is that women think they are above this...wanting equality, but when given it, they cry foul.

    The hypocrisy is on your side.

    ReplyDelete
  17. And here we are once again, women proving beyond all reasonable doubt that some of us are utter fuck tards.

    Thanks ladies !

    ReplyDelete
  18. Eat shit, donna. You're the biggest fuck tard of "some of us".

    ReplyDelete